By Brent | Last Updated: 20/01/2026

The Best Biological Age Tests of 2026: An Independent Comparison

Key Takeaways

   > Biological age tests estimate aging using molecular biomarkers, not chronological age.

   > DNA methylation–based epigenetic clocks remain the most validated tools available.

   > Rate-of-aging models provide more actionable insight than single age numbers.

   > No biological age test is diagnostic or predictive of lifespan on its own.

   > These tools are best used for trend tracking, not one-time conclusions.

What Is a Biological Age Test and Why Should You Care?

A biological age test estimates how old your body appears at a cellular or molecular level. Unlike chronological age, it reflects cumulative stress, lifestyle choices, genetics, and environmental exposure.

Large population studies show biological age correlates more strongly with disease risk and mortality than calendar age, making it useful for longevity planning when interpreted carefully.

How Do Epigenetic Clocks Actually Work?

Most biological age tests rely on DNA methylation, a chemical process that regulates gene expression without altering DNA sequence.

Modern epigenetic clocks analyze thousands of methylation sites and compare them to reference datasets. Newer models, such as DunedinPACE, estimate how fast aging is occurring rather than assigning a single biological age number. This improves sensitivity to lifestyle and intervention changes.

Important limitations remain. Results can vary by tissue type, ethnicity, health status, and testing interval. Short-term improvements do not automatically translate into long-term health benefits.

The Best Biological Age Tests of 2026 (Ranked)

Based on scientific methodology, biomarker depth, transparency, and usefulness for repeat testing, six platforms stand out in 2026. These tests represent different approaches to measuring aging, not interchangeable scores.

How We Evaluated Each Test

Each product was reviewed using the following criteria:

   > Biomarkers measured (DNA methylation, glycans, telomeres, immune age)

   > Clock methodology (peer-reviewed vs proprietary)

   > Actionability of results

   > Longitudinal tracking value

   > Transparency and scientific backing

TruDiagnostic TruAge: The Deep Dive

What it does:
TruAge COMPLETE measures biological age using multiple DNA methylation clocks, telomere length, and immune aging metrics.

Why it stands out:

   > Combines DunedinPACE with traditional epigenetic clocks

   > Includes supplemental reports on immune aging and caloric restriction response

   > Optional clinician consultation improves interpretation

Limitations:

   > Higher cost than most consumer tests

   > Dense reports may overwhelm non-technical users

Best for:
Those seeking the most comprehensive molecular assessment of aging currently available.

CTA: Get Tested | Request a Clinical Review

NOVOS Age: The Deep Dive

What it does:
NOVOS Age measures biological aging using DNA methylation analysis with a focus on rate of aging.

Why it stands out:

   > Built around DunedinPACE, a third-generation rate-of-aging clock

   > Highly sensitive to lifestyle interventions

   > Reporting designed for repeat testing

Limitations:

   > Narrower biomarker scope than multi-panel tests

   > Less clinical depth for organ-specific insights

Best for:
Individuals actively testing diet, exercise, sleep, or supplement interventions.

CTA: Get Tested | View Sample Report

Elysium Health Index: The Deep Dive

What it does:
Index estimates biological age using a proprietary machine-learning model developed with Illumina.

Why it stands out:

   > Streamlined, consumer-friendly reporting

   > Large internal benchmarking dataset

   > Optional participation in longevity research initiatives

Limitations:

   > Less methodological transparency than academic clocks

   > Focuses exclusively on DNA methylation

Best for:
Users prioritizing simplicity, brand trust, and longitudinal tracking.

CTA: Get Tested

myDNAge: The Deep Dive

What it does:
myDNAge estimates biological age using Dr. Steve Horvath’s epigenetic aging clock, one of the most extensively peer-reviewed models in the field.

Why it stands out:

   > Based on the original Horvath Clock methodology

   > Analyzes over 2,000 epigenetic markers

   > Offers risk insights for metabolic and aging-related conditions

Limitations:

   > Less sensitive to short-term lifestyle changes

   > Primarily a snapshot rather than a rate-of-aging tool

Best for:
Those who want a biologically grounded, research-validated baseline measure.

CTA: Get Tested

Tally Health TallyAge: The Deep Dive

What it does:
TallyAge estimates biological age using DNA methylation analysis from a non-invasive cheek swab.

Why it stands out:

   > Backed by a large proprietary dataset of over 8,000 individuals

   > Integrates lifestyle and health context into reporting

   > Part of a broader longevity membership ecosystem

Limitations:

   > Proprietary methodology limits external validation

   > Less granular biomarker reporting than blood-based tests

Best for:
Users seeking a simple, ongoing longevity platform with testing included.

CTA: Get Tested | Explore Membership

GlycanAge: The Deep Dive

What it does:
GlycanAge measures immune system aging through IgG glycan biomarkers associated with chronic inflammation.

Why it stands out:

   > Strong links to cardiometabolic and inflammatory risk

   > Highly responsive to lifestyle and stress changes

   > Complements epigenetic clocks rather than replacing them

Limitations:

   > Does not measure DNA methylation

   > Not designed to provide a single biological age number

Best for:
Tracking inflammation-driven aging and immune system resilience.

CTA: Get Tested | View Sample Report

Which Test Is Right for You?

Comparison Table

How Often Should You Retest?

For most people, retesting every 6–12 months is sufficient. More frequent testing often reflects biological noise rather than meaningful change.

Retesting is most valuable when paired with structured interventions such as exercise programs, dietary changes, sleep optimization, or clinical longevity protocols.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most accurate biological age test available?

DNA methylation–based tests show the strongest correlation with disease risk. Multi-clock and rate-of-aging models currently offer the most actionable insight.

How much does a biological age test cost?

Most consumer tests range from $200 to $500, depending on biomarker depth and reporting complexity.

Can I lower my biological age after testing?

Some biomarkers respond to lifestyle changes, but short-term improvements do not guarantee long-term risk reduction.

How often should I take a biological age test?

Once per year is sufficient for most users. More frequent testing is useful only during structured interventions.

Are at-home biological age tests accurate?

They are directionally useful but not diagnostic. Results should be interpreted as trends, not medical conclusions.

What is the difference between chronological age and biological age?

Chronological age measures time lived. Biological age reflects accumulated cellular and physiological stress.

Do insurance companies cover biological age testing?

No. These tests are considered elective wellness tools.

Final Perspective

I hope this helped anyone out there wanting to explore any of this. I’ve personally only done one of these, and that will change here in the future, as I’ll be testing ALL of these back-to-back and sharing those results. I do love that biological age testing is advancing rapidly, and we still have to acknowledge that it remains an early-stage decision-support tool rather than a predictor of lifespan. Used correctly, it can guide smarter health choices and track long-term trends. Used incorrectly, it can create false certainty.

In 2026, the most credible approach is informed skepticism combined with consistent measurement, not chasing a single number.